On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 09:54:15PM -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote: > Anthony Towns wrote: > >So, debian-legal is "us", leaving the rest of the project to be > >"them"? > When I'm sending a message to debian-legal, yes, I often use "us" to > mean the participants on debian-legal. I intend only to save a little > typing, nothing more.
I realise you didn't intend anything by it, but look at it again: > > > The Project essentially told us our conclusion "the GFDL is not free" > > > is wrong in the case where there are no invariant sections. debian-legal is only useful in so far as it's somewhere for Debian to talk about licenses. If the "participants on debian-legal" have different conclusions to the Debian project as a whole, that's a major problem in that people going to get Debian's opinion are instead getting something quite different. You didn't quote: > > > The Project did not tell us why. > > You could ask, you know. You still can do that, you know, if you actually want the answer. Cheers, aj
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
