On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 10:37:07PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> On 3/14/06, Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The GFDL specifically says that it must "clearly and legibly identify you".
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > Ambiguity and clarity are opposites, and pseudonyms do not identify you.
>
> My dad's name is "Ron Miller". Are you claiming that his name does
> not identify him?
>
> There's thousands of "Ron Millers" in the U.S. alone. Are you claiming
> that there's no ambiguity here?
>
> I don't see any requirement in the GFDL that a person's identity
> must be unambiguous, sworn to, attested, co-signed, pgp signed,
> unique, guaranteed, warranteed, trackable, reachable, emailable,
> etc.
Using a pseudonym to make it harder to identify you is in clear violation
of the above-quoted requirement. You've indicated that it's difficult to
do so, but the intent of this clause remains very clear.
--
Glenn Maynard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
