Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 11:01:19PM -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote: > > However, Option 1 was the consensus of this list, and thus we've been > > overridden[0]. I feel that we now need to figure out why the project as > > a whole has rejected the draft position statement [2] and render our > > The GFDL has more serious problems than most licenses, and Debian has stuck > its rubber stamp on them; we're stuck with them, probably for good. I'm > sure any pretense from the FSF of trying to fix these problems will be > dropped entirely now, since Debian has said they're OK. The project has > asserted that onerous practical problems are acceptable.
An interesting practical effect of this vote is that only FSF documents are excluded from main. Cheers, Walter Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
