Frank K=FCster asked:
> Does debian-legal think that a
> document with a DFSG-free license and with sources available except for
> the embedded fonts is DFSG-free or not?
I don't think a binary file follows the DFSG as a whole if it
contains fonts which do not follow DFSG 2 ("Source Code").
Sorry not to give the answer you wanted.
> I don't want to hear technical comments whether it is desirable or
> doable to rebuild the documentation, but whether it is legally possible
> to distribute such documents.
It may be legally possible to distribute such documents,
depending on the terms of the fonts. I think it is a serious
bug if they are in main.
Hope that helps explain,
--
MJR/slef
My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
