Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 11:37:14AM +0400, olive wrote:
If that is what you think, you must first have the DFSG changed *before*
declaring the license non-free.
No, I must not do any such thing. And who are you to tell me I must?
I mean "you have to"; being not a native English speaker; I have used
the word "must" in a wrong context; please forgive me. However I do not
see *anything* in the DFSG which let think that choice of venue is
non-free. Although I do not share this point of view; you might think
that we should add a rule saying they are not free: this is a legitimate
though. It is not legitimate however to declare them non-free just
because you do not like it and then abusively say that it is non free
according to DFSG.
Olive
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
