Evan Prodromou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't have an idea of when the 3.0 license draft will be available, > what other changes there may be, or pretty much where things go from > here. But I do know that CC seems to take DFSG-compatibility seriously > and that they're going to be open to our input.
Thank you for the report; it sounds promising, but on the other hand it sounds as if talking upstream authors[1] into relicensing their documentation with a CC license will not be an option for etch. Regards, Frank [1] Of GFDL-or-other licensed documentation where "use the same as for the program" is not applicable -- Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX)
