On 1/23/06, Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1/13/06, Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Not really. I expect that any court will ignore Moglen's drivel > > like the Judge Saris did in the MySQL case and will interpret > > the GPL as a contract (and in this case as a breach of contractual > > covenant to forbear from the exercise of the statutory right under > > 17 USC 109 and instead provide access to source code as the > > copyright owner decrees). My argument is that it's quite easy to > > "escape" it by NOT entering into agreement. > > In the case Saris ruled on, there was a signed contract.
Regarding what? regards, alexander.
