[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

>I don't agree that this clause is DFSG-free.
>It says that the name of an augmented font cannot *include* the term
>STIX or *any similar* term.
>That is significantly broader than what is allowed by DFGS#4, which
>states (in part):
Your understanding of the DFSG is well beyond what so far has been its
commonly accepted meaning.

-- 
ciao,
Marco


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to