Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 06:24:19AM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote: >> What mistakes? Pretty much the entire free software community believes >> that patch-clause licenses are acceptable. Why do you think that they're >> not? > > You're asking me to repeat the entire discussion I just had with you and > Michael, where I explained very explicitly the serious problems of patch > clauses? If you've accidentally deleted your mailbox, I'm sure it's in > the list archives.
No, you've described why they cause practical inconvenience. You haven't described why everyone else ever was wrong. -- Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
