Frank Küster writes: > I wouldn't be too sure that "set" doesn't have a different meaning to > lawyers than it has to mathematicians or computer scientists. > > Anyway, I doubt whether sequence is correct, too - unless you redefine > sequence to include conditional execution and loops.
Regardless of what copyright law defines a thing to mean, contracts are free to define the terms they use, and where such a definition is given directly or via parol evidence, it supercedes (within the scope of that contract) the definitions found in statute or copyright office policies. Michael Poole
