On 1/17/06, Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Bernhard R. Link: > > > But it lists no conditions that that stuff is in any way free. > > When I do not misread it, it would even Microsoft to take any > > GPLv3 program, extend it, build an API around the extensions > > and distribute it together with their Operating system, only > > having to give the source without any of their extensions. > > They already do this with Interix. As you write, it's a GPLv2 > violation.
Sez who? (Besides you, that is.) BTW, care to explain what you (and GPLv3) mean by contractually not defined terms "extension", "subunit", and whatnot other gibberish I just don't recall at the moment? regards, alexander.
