Henning Makholm wrote: > Why on earth do they not just license it as GPL straight away? That > would not prevent them from offering other license terms in addition > for a fee (or without one) as they see fit.
They may be worried about whether dynamic linking against their software creates a derivative work. With that language, they try to take away that worry. Arnoud -- Arnoud Engelfriet, Dutch & European patent attorney - Speaking only for myself Patents, copyright and IPR explained for techies: http://www.iusmentis.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
