Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > | License to copy and use this software is granted provided that it > | is identified as "RSA Security Inc. PKCS #11 Cryptographic Token > | Interface (Cryptoki)" in all material mentioning or referencing this > | software or this function. > > Permission to copy is granted for something that is clearly unmodified > (it must be identified as "RSA Security Inc. PKCS #11 Cryptographic > Token Interface (Cryptoki)").
It (the original) is still so identified by the following: > | License is also granted to make and use derivative works provided > | that such works are identified as "derived from the RSA Security Inc. > | PKCS #11 Cryptographic Token Interface (Cryptoki)" in all material > | mentioning or referencing the derived work. I think it's a stretch to claim the permission only covers unmodifieds. It would be better clearer, but it doesn't seem a problem. [...] > > Yes. That seems to be a copyright *notice*, not a licence. > > What licence covers the file? > > The debian/copyright file does not seem to say that. Hence *either* > debian/copyright is incomplete (minor bug) *or* testmd4.c is > undistributable (serious bug). > Is that right? Given the main licence does not enumerates exactly which parts it covers, I'd suspect incomplete if anything, but I don't see why you're so sure it's not under the main licence's terms. -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
