George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There are real-world examples that choice-of-venue clauses could be more > dangerous than without them. I'm not sure is DFSG can catch these challenges, > but it certainly should not be read as glossary or as a bullet list with do's > and dont's.
The DFSG define what we consider free and what we consider non-free. If you believe that there's an issue that should prevent distribution of something, then say so - there are various pieces of DFSG software we fail to distribute because of other legal issues (primarily patent problems). But don't suggest that it's any sort of freeness issue. -- Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
