Sven Luther writes: > On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 08:38:19PM -0400, Catatonic Porpoise wrote: >> Marco d'Itri wrote: >> >> >>This might fail the Dissident test (and thus discriminate against >> >> >> >> >> >Which is not part of the DFSG, so it does not matter. >> > >> > >> The Dissident test is a test for DFSG #5, so it does matter. See: >> >> http://wiki.debian.net/?DissidentTest >> http://people.debian.org/~bap/dfsg-faq.html > > Can we go back to interpreting the DFSG and the licence in real terms, instead > of blindingly trying to apply random strange tests ?
Can we please not interpret DFSG#5 as saying "A license may not discriminate against any person or group of persons unless somebody thinks such discrimination is acceptable"? DFSG#5 is very plain and very broad: it prohibits discrimination against *any* person or group. If you think it should be narrowed, propose an amendment to the SC. Michael Poole -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
