Le mardi 30 août 2005 à 14:19 +0100, Simos Xenitellis a écrit : > >As it is, the license is clearly non-free. It could become free if, for > >example, they let the right to modify existing glyphs if references to > >"stix" are removed. > > > > > My belief is, this is exactly what Point 4 says. If the fonts are > "augmented" (changed; derivative work), > quit the STIX reference (or similar, like Sticks, Steex,) and provide > your own name for them. > Distribution is available as normally.
No. Point 4 makes an explicit reference to section 3b to define "augmented". It means this clause is an additional restriction; it doesn't give any right for a derivative work. > >This is exactly why I added debian-legal as a CC, but you removed it in > >your reply. > > > I simply replied to the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" address. I need to > learn more on this bugs system. > I send this e-mail in personal, not to screw again the headers. Please, keep the discussion on the debian-legal mailing list (which has nothing to do with the bug tracking system) and stop answering privately. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette /\./\ : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
