On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 09:29:45PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > Francesco Poli wrote: > > >Version 2.5 licenses feature *some* little improvements, but they do not > >solve, AFAICT, all the issues that were found out in 2.0 ones. > > > However, the problem is well in hand. Debian is working with the CC people > on a draft > new version (3.0?) and it appears that there are no irreconcilable > differences; the > next version should be DFSG-free. > > So if you put "2.5 or later" I guess you'll probably be OK soon....
I'm not sure that's really valid. CC licenses don't have an upgrade clause. Go with the MIT license unless you've got a *really* good reason not to. If you want a CC license, sit and wait, this will be fixed sometime. Hopefully by the end of the year. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
