On 7/18/05, Michael K. Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/18/05, Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Are you suggesting that the use of time -> frequency domain mapping > > is not ostensibly covered by the presumptively valid patents? > > If you want to know what I am suggesting, with regard to a particular > patent from the Fraunhofer suite (which I have looked at _very_ > quickly and remember that in any case I am not qualified to judge), > read http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/07/msg00141.html .
This seems tangential, and does not answer my question. > > Or, perhaps that all other such techniques which have been in use > > for quite some time (such as favoring frequencies which the human > > ear is sensitive to) are all not ostensibly covered by the presumptively > > valid patents? [more non-answer elided.] If you don't have a simple answer for these questions, please don't imply that you have. Thanks, -- Raul
