Henning Makholm schrieb am Monday, den 03. January 2005: > Scripsit Micah Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > There is of course the possibility that the EULA is too "draconian" to > > even go into non-free, that I don't know so I ask you folks. The EULA > > has been posted to: > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-wnpp/2005/01/msg00086.html > > It is OK for non-free.
I prefer not to include this in non-free if I can help it, so although it is good to know that it is OK for non-free, I am going to see if the upstream is willing to change the license so it can be included in main first. But if that will take too long, for whatever reason, I will consider putting it into non-free to get it into Sarge before freeze and then move it into main if it gets resolved. I am not interested in maintaining it if it stays in non-free however. > Parts of section 2 appear to contradict section 1: [snip] > but I don't think that is a showstopper for non-free. [snip] > "Scandalize" is almost certainly a mistranslation of some German > original meaning something else, but I'm not sure which. I've forwarded these to the upstream. > I get a distinct feeling that the author of this license is trying to > do the Right Thing, but is confused and/or misguided. We would be > happy to provide assistance in finding or drafting a free license that > satisfies the upstream author, if you need it. I would really appreciate that, hopefully the upstream would also be amenable to this, we shall see. Micah ps - please continue to CC me as I am not subscribed to debian-legal
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
