Dave Harding wrote:
Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 12:59:08AM -0700, Joel Aelwyn wrote:
Mind you, I don't think I'd necessarily have an issue with "To use
this trademark, you must run a publically reviewable bug tracking
system and implement some form of version management" (I might
still, on a question of practicality, or even a basic question of
"Does this make it a required cost of the software, and is that
OK?", but it would be a matter of another debate entirely, at that
point).
The problem with this sort of clause is usually the same: what the
hell does it mean?
Or rather, what does it have to do with Mozilla's requirements?
Indeed - I proposed no requirement of that form. There's no good way of
predicting whether someone will ship good or bad software except track
record.
Gerv
