Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The parsimonious explanation is that the issue wasn't thought about in > that much detail when the social contract was written. The archives tend > to support this. The obvious thing to do here is not to attempt to find > a way that we can interpret the SC that makes sense - the obvious thing > to do here is to decide what we want the SC to say and then change it so > that it matches that desire.
We already did that.
