On Sun, 5 Dec 2004 18:35:03 +0100 (CET) Santiago Vila wrote: > reassign 284340 debian-policy > thanks
Whooops... :p [...] > > In other words, I would think that the following licenses belong in > > /usr/share/common-licenses/ : > > [...] > > You probably have not read base-files FAQ. You are quite right: I haven't... I apologize for this. The reason is that no such FAQ exists in Woody and I didn't know that such a file was included in Sarge/Sid... :p > Please read the answer to this question: > > Q. Why isn't license "foo" included in common-licenses? Mmmmh, I see. The answer is: | A. I delegate such decisions to the policy group. If you want to | propose a new license you should make a policy proposal to modify the | paragraph in policy saying "Packages distributed under the UCB BSD | license, Artistic license, GNU GPL and GNU LGPL should refer to the | files in /usr/share/common-licenses". The way of doing this is | explained in the debian-policy package. As usual, you should always | take a look at already reported bugs against debian-policy before | submitting a new one. > IMHO, the licenses you propose to be added to > /usr/share/common-licenses are short enough that no disk space is > saved at all by having a "single" copy in base-files. For this reason > I think we could even remove the current BSD license itself, since > it's just 1499 bytes long. Yes, they are fairly short. But, IMVHO, having them in /usr/share/common-licenses would help to clarify their differences and their canonical text and proper name. Moreover the current BSD license includes (as I said) a particular copyright holder's name: referring to it (or even copying & pasting it) would often be a mistake. I still think that my proposed common-licenses reordering would benefit Debian... -- Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday. ...................................................................... Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4 Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgp7KQTL8OfBk.pgp
Description: PGP signature