Bernhard R. Link writes: > * Michael Poole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040915 15:00]: > > On the other hand, I always thought free software was about protecting > > users, not patent litigants who are supposed to already have working > > forms of the patented invention. > > <cynism> > What about people selling non-free software, builders of nuclear bombs, > terrorists, criminals, US-goverment agents, abortion medics, > religious fundamentals, communists, lawyers, ... > </cynism>
Troll. (Your choice whether that describes you or an item you omitted. If you want to make a serious attempt to apply DFSG #5 or #6 to patent termination, I'm listening, but please craft your argument so that it does not classify the GPL as non-free because it discriminates against people who want to sell binary-only versions of free software.) Michael Poole
