> > http://people.debian.org/~bap/dfsg-faq.html
> Yuck. If I might reinterpret your comments a tad more abstractly, I take it you're saying that the document exceeded the mandate of its title, since it discusses free software license issues in general; and that it has insufficient global structure. Is that right? These both seem like reasonable points. It does seem reasonable to try to address common Debian-relevant license-related questions in one document, including both questions about the DFSG itself and about the penumbra of license-related issues. So I changed the title to try to make it a bit broader! Lack of global structure is a problem, and I'd very welcome someone else making a serious editing pass---especially one that tried to impose a coherent global structure on beast. -- Barak A. Pearlmutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hamilton Institute, NUI Maynooth, Co. Kildare, Ireland http://www-bcl.cs.may.ie/~barak/
