* Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040827 01:15]:
> If "GPL v2" is understood to prohibit the exercise of either of the
> options from section 9, then this interpretation would have merit.

GPL v2 cannot mean to prohibit anything. As section 9 says that
GPL v2 means GPL v2. (And one could have made it available under
other licences by placing a "or any later version" to it)

Hochachtungsvoll,
  Bernhard R. Link

Reply via email to