* Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040827 01:15]: > If "GPL v2" is understood to prohibit the exercise of either of the > options from section 9, then this interpretation would have merit.
GPL v2 cannot mean to prohibit anything. As section 9 says that GPL v2 means GPL v2. (And one could have made it available under other licences by placing a "or any later version" to it) Hochachtungsvoll, Bernhard R. Link