Andrew Suffield writes: >On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 11:34:43PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> >assume the rest of your argument holds true, the most you can say >> >about that is that they're a (perhaps unintentional) effort to >> >sabotage the work of -legal. >> >> Simple question: what do you think _is_ the "work of -legal"? > >License analysis.
Thanks, that's a useful response. License analysis To what end? -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is there anybody out there?
