On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 02:19:32PM -0400, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote: > Please cite relevant text from the GPL.
Section 9. > I don't see anything like that. > All I see is a common license from authors that software is available > under the GNU GPL, version 2 or any later version, at the discretion > of the *recipient*. I suppose you could claim that a loophole exists here, if the FSF never receives a copy of your changes. But that doesn't have any impact on other cases. -- Raul
