* Andrew Suffield: > Yes. That's the whole point of the NM process. If this were not true > then it would be unnecessary. The following is an example of an > unacceptable opinion for a Debian applicant: > >> 5a. The GNU Free Documentaion License (FDL) has been heavily discussed >> on debian-legal recently. Read >> http://people.debian.org/~srivasta/Position_Statement.html and >> briefly explain how you feel about the including documents >> licensed under the FDL in main and what consequences of this >> position might be for Debian. > > Debian should ignore licenses and include everything in main.
It's too short to be a valid answer, IMHO, but there's a certain line of thinking perfectly acceptable among DDs which would completely justify such a hyperbolic comment.
