Am Fre, den 06.08.2004 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED] um 21:11: > So, this is a side-note about the Helix Player, not fully concerned with the > RPSL per se. > > As I understand it, the Helix player (client side) has recently been > dual-licensed under the GPL. > > There doesn't appear to be any way that the dual-licensing prevents users > from exercising freedoms protected by the GPL, so barring any of the > multitude of problems that can make GPL'd software non-free, it seems to me > that at least the Helix player is Free Software, and should be included in > either main or contrib. > > I don't know what the dependencies are, or if there are any dependencies > that would prevent it from being in main. Thomas, is enough of the helix > player code GPL'd that we can include it in main, regardless of what we > conclude about the RPSL?
Yes, the whole code of Helix Player _and_ the underlying Helix DNA Client engine is GPL'd -> can go into main. (actually player + client are tri-licensed [GPL/RPSL/RCSL]). See: https://helixcommunity.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=128 Thomas
