MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2004-08-08 10:49:43 +0100 Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > [...] A weekly "bits from -legal" type post would be a > > useful thing: a short summary of licenses/clauses discussed and the > > salient points brought up. That might encourage contributions from the > > rest of the project, such that other DDs might start to care about > > what goes on here... > > Thanks to you and Mark Brown for the extra info. I do other > newsletters already, so I'll have a go at this instead of submitting > to DWN, shooting for a Monday preview here and Tuesday post to d-d-a. > If others want to help, I'd appreciate it, so please let me know (I'll > not set infrastructure up until pinged and probably not for first ish > unless it's really offensive not to).
I'm not so sure that it should go to d-d-a. For one time deals, where a legal analysis affects a lot of packages, sure. But not for a weekly synopsis. That is more like a mailing list of its own (like kernel-traffic). Regards, Walter Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
