On Tue, 3 Aug 2004 19:48:38 -0400 Glenn Maynard wrote: > On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 11:00:17PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > > This time, however, I thought that I should keep the > > Mail-Followup-To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, > > debian-legal@lists.debian.org already set in the thread... > > Correct me if I'm wrong. > > I'm not sure exactly how it should be set in this case; because Mutt > just does the right thing, I've never had to worry about it.
Well, I was trying (and now I succeeded, thanks to Andrew Saunders that
explained me, in private, how to do that!) to reproduce manually the
Right(TM) behaviour of Mutt, that is (IIUC): when replying to a message
that has a Mail-Followup-To header, put those addresses in the To header
*and* in the Mail-Followup-To header.
But now, we are going rather OT...
We'd better continue in private, if there's something else to add!
--
| GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4 | $ fortune
Francesco | Key fingerprint = | Q: What is purple
Poli | C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 | and commutes?
| 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4 | A: A boolean grape.
pgpJPLy2QwaNo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
