On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 01:59:59PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 05:16:36PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote: > > [on the 4-clause BSD license's compelled-advertising clause being > GPL-incompatible] > > > As a point of note, RMS has said that this interpretation is considered to > > be a bug in the GPL, and that the FSF has no current intention of pursuing > > violations of this, because it wasn't intended (they still, of course, > > recommend going to a 3 or even 2 clause variant of the license). > > > > I believe I still have the email somewhere in my archives if necessary, but > > to date it hasn't been terribly relevant. > > That's useful to know, but not dispositive for Debian's purposes. That the > FSF regards this as a violation they can overlook doesn't mean other people > using the GNU GPL won't, and there are many. (Harald Welte of the > netfilter Project is just one example of recent prominence.) > > The DFSG-freeness of a particular license as interpreted by a particular > licensor on a particular work is almost always the most important > evaluation that Debian has to make. > > For further reading: > http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=17409 > http://lwn.net/Articles/95006/
Correct in all ways, and I apologize if I wasn't explicit enough. It was
intended to be an informative point of interest / good thing to know, not a
declaration that there weren't issues at all. Sorry about that.
Really, there are so many good reasons to drop that clause that I don't
grasp why some folks refuse to (when asked; I certainly understand why they
wouldn't necessarily care enough to bother if nobody has ever requested it
and they haven't gotton to making sure that ti's doable for their code).
Sadly, I have run into a few. Some in distressingly pivotal locations.
(There is the counter-argument that if the clause is a no-op due to laws
already enforcing it, as is often argued when asking to drop it, that it is
not a 'meaningful' extra restriction, and shouldn't be considered to make
it incompatible, but that's really a huge, nasty can of worms I'd rather
not even get into, in part because I don't pretend to know enough to
grasp which jurisdictions it might apply in.)
--
Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ,''`.
Debian GNU/kNetBSD(i386) porter : :' :
`. `'
http://nienna.lightbearer.com/ `-
pgp7crrcJmuBP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
