On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 06:27:36PM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote: > I find 80% to be pretty clear. I guess you're one of the people claiming > that there's a silent majority secretly disagreeing with the vast majority > of d-legal (who can't be bothered to state their opinion and its rationale), > so there's no point in arguing this further.
Way to ignore what I actually wrote. What I said was that most DD's aren't aware of the issue, which is very different than silent disagreement. DD's have universally agreed to uphold the DFSG, not some additional material that's grounded in one interpretation of the DFSG. As a result, I'd bet that many would be surprised when a license is declared non-free because of something that they did not agree to. I personally don't think that -legal does a good enough job of communicating with the rest of the project, and I know I'm not the only one. My opinion on the silence is a reflection of this lack of communication, not some hand-waving fake telepathy[1]. - David Nusinow [1] I was happy to see the Dictator Test announced in DWN. I think that's a very positive step in the right direction.
