On Sun, Jul 25, 2004 at 07:41:02AM -0400, Walter Landry wrote: > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 09:23:30PM -0400, Walter Landry wrote: > > > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 12:59:33PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > > > | a. Modifications must not alter or remove any copyright notices > > > > | in the Software. > > > > > > > > Again, pretty standard. > > > > > > Actually, I just realized this might be a problem. Files often have > > > copyright notices in them. You can't have a patch which entirely > > > removes those files. > > > > > > Also, the program may print out a copyright notice (as in GPL 3c). > > > You are not allowed to add your own name to that list. > > > > I suppose common sense clearly solve this issue, but would a modification of > > the clause solve this ? > > I would say so. I don't think that the intent is non-free.
Would you care to propose any wording for it ? Friendly, Sven Luther
