Sven Luther wrote: > On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 06:14:36PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: >>As far as I can tell, there is no consensus on whether "upstream gets an >>all-permissive license" is non-free. I personally consider it > > Again, you didn't seem to read the QPL, or maybe didn't understand it. Where > does it say an "all permisive licence" ?
I was paraphrasing 3b, which grants upstream the right to distribute your software in their proprietary product (as long as they also put it in the Free version). I don't think such a requirement is non-free, just obnoxious. - Josh Triplett
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
