On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 02:28:07PM -0400, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote: > compiler to tell for sure what this means. But when I see INRIA > handing out a license that specifically mentions items which link to > the compiler, I have to assume that they mean *something*, and didn't > just pick a license with a giant meaningless clause.
Especially since we've already been told that INRIA took a lot of time deciding on the QPL. The only issue is whether INRIA's interpretation of the licence is a lot different to how we're interpreting it. - Matt
