> > Unless -- we want to assert that all GPL-derived licenses used in > > Debian must be GPL-compatible. [...]
On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 08:27:10AM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote: > Since the question is raised, I do not agree with making that assertion > and I do not believe it to be the consensus of this list. However, it's probably worth noting that there's a big difference between [a] using the GPL verbatim and providing some additional license, and [b] using some other license which happens to include terms from the GPL. This thread was based on an instance of [a]. [When this thread started, that instance was non-distributable because of a silly mistake. It has since been fixed.] I would hope that this is obvious -- we'd have serious problems if it were not. -- Raul