Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 11:12:57AM -0800, D. Starner wrote: >> Sven Luther writes: >> >> > Sorry, but i don't believe such a request is legally binding. >> >> I do. More to the point, neither of us is the judge who's going to > > Well, as said, i did some legal consulting, and the mention that a TV > broadcasted request for patches should be legally binding did bring in some > round of laughter.
Did you explain to your legal advisor that this is a broadcast request in the context where you're operating within a license obliging you to obey such requests? > Furthermore, i was mentioned the fact that the request should be > nominal, both to the modificator and the actual patch involved, I apologize, but I cannot understand what you mean by a request being nominal to the modifier or the patch. Where does this idea of "nominal"ness appear in the QPL? -Brian -- Brian Sniffen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
