Thanks for not CCing me as i have repeatedly asked here. >On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 10:07:57PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: >> Furthermore, as the choice of law is the french law, preliminary information >> seem to indicate that any procedure should be domiciliated at the domicil of >> the defendor, which would make this clause illegal and thus void. > >Good, then upstream should not object to this void clause being removed >from the license.
Sure whatever. i have done my homework, asked for advice, which altough legal was not exactly of this field, and this is really non conclusive. And i will _NOT_ go to upstream about this issue without solid evidence that this is really a problem, evidence that i have not seen upto now. Friendly, Sven Luther
