Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jacobo Tarrio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Tests are only for testing, not for stretching as much as we can: "but he > >can just ignore the license. If he's a dissident it's not like he's not > >breaking any law". Oh, yes, but that's what the dissident test was made for. > > The problem is that it's not clear what the dissident test was made for.
I think one purpose is to clarify the kinds of uses that DFSG #6 covers. If you can't even use it in those kinds of situations, then you don't have a free license. Regards, Walter Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
