On Tue, 13 Jul 2004, Josh Triplett wrote: > a more carefully written requirement that source must be distributed > and freedoms given to the *users* of a piece of software still seems > reasonable to me.
I want to think it is reasonable as well, but I haven't yet been able to articulate a method of doing this that is not onerous and needlessly restricts where a work can be used. So, in theory, I think I agree, but I have yet to find a real live license clause that was sanely worded that actually did this without restricting things that make the license non free. All the attempts that I've seen (and made myself) so far have had rather serious problems. Don Armstrong -- Q: What Can a Thoughtful Man Hope for Mankind on Earth, Given the Experience of the Past Million Years? A: Nothing. -- Bokonon _The Fourteenth Book of Bokonon_ (Vonnegut _Cats Cradle_) http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
