Given what Christian Hammers has said below, I guess debian-legal better move quickly to evaluate what's going on here.
(I personally only have a vague recollection of the issue in question, and
would have to review bug logs/mailing list threads to get back up to
speed.)
Mr. Hammers, in the future when declaring that you're awaiting feedback
from the debian-legal list, it might be wise to let them know. :)
----- Forwarded message from Christian Hammers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----
From: Christian Hammers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: debian-policy@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#242449: mysql vs. libdbd-mysql-perl vs. apache
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 00:43:33 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailing-List: <debian-policy@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/17192
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.10claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-pc-linux-gnu)
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no
version=2.63-lists.debian.org_2004_06_20_05
Hello Mat
On 2004-07-06 Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> Any word on this? Did the licensing change become official last month, as
> hoped?
Yes, being just back from holidays I see that the version 1.4 of the FLOSS
Exception Licence made its way to the documentation at the mysql.com web site:
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql/en/MySQL_FOSS_License_Exception.html
As far as I understood the issues this bug can now be closed. I will do it if
I do not receive any objections in the next 2-3 days from the debian-legal
people (in case another problem arose while I was away...).
bye,
-christian-
----- End forwarded message -----
--
G. Branden Robinson | The basic test of freedom is
Debian GNU/Linux | perhaps less in what we are free to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | do than in what we are free not to
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | do. -- Eric Hoffer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
