* Brian T. Sniffen: > That is, I owe two fees to the initial developer of the software. > First, I give him a license to distribute my modifications in future > versions of the software, and to use that code in non-free derivatives > of the software. Second, if he asks for it I also supply a copy even > if I have not distributed them to anyone. This is a fee as described > by DFSG #1.
This argument *must* be flawed because the same argument can show that *any* copyleft license violates DFSG #1, which clearly is not the case.
