* MJ Ray: > On 2004-07-12 13:42:36 +0100 Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> ...because CC*SA is not DFSG-free at the moment, >> Why do you think so? ShareAlike 2.0 hasn't been reviewed so far. > > ShareAlike 2.0 hasn't been reviewed because it doesn't exist! Maybe > you mean BY-SA? That shares the troublesome clause 4a of > BY.
I fail to see how this clause is troublesome. What's wrong with removing the names of authors upon request, as long as it practicable?
