On 2004-07-12 08:18:21 +0100 Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Why, particularly, should he deviate from the fine example set by
Craig
Sanders and other supporters of Proposal D?
Craig Sanders himself voted Further Discussion as second preference
and ignored all other outcomes, despite claiming "We had enough
discussion on this subject and some of us are sick of it" in his
rationale. Most of his supporters did the same. I think it's a bit
late to start expecting consistent behaviour.
--
MJR/slef My Opinion Only and not of any group I know
http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ for creative copyleft computing
"Matthew Garrett is quite the good sort of fellow, despite what
my liver is sure to say about him in [...] 40 years" -- branden
