On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 04:00:36AM -0500, Joe Wreschnig wrote:
> I'm also not in favor of this tacit "assume we aren't violating the
> intent of the license when we're clearly violating the letter of it,
> unless we find out otherwise" precedent that's being set by this; we
> didn't accept it for KDE, so why is it okay for the kernel?

Because some folks have to have someone else to blame for their own
ignorance.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson                |    Half of being smart is knowing what
Debian GNU/Linux                   |    you're dumb at.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                 |    -- David Gerrold
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to