On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 05:00:54PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: >Your modifications, corrections, or extensions have value. ... > This clause violates the intent of DFSG 1, in my opinion. "The license > may not require a royalty or other fee for such sale." It does not seem > reasonable to me to assume that the license *may* require royalty or > other fees for other activities, apart from sale, normally protected by > copyright but which are part and parcel of software freedom.
You should provide a more significant objection than "your modifications have value". "Distribution of source", as required by the GPL, has value, so your logic would this mean that the GPL is non-free. -- Raul
