On Sat, 2004-06-19 at 18:17, Benjamin Cutler wrote: > Perhaps my choice of words was poor, but I think that emulators fall > into their own class of software because they rely on what is generally > commercial, non-free (and honestly, quite probably illegal) software in > order to run, which is why they fall into contrib.
I guess I'm just not sure I buy that an emulator is materially different from a script interpreter, DFSG-wise. A quick 'apt-cache search emulator' turns up quite a few emulators in main. I can find a few that don't have supported programs in main -- mixal would be one. B-) ~ESP
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
