On Fri, 2004-06-18 at 10:51, William Lee Irwin III wrote: > On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 11:35:43AM -0400, Raul Miller wrote: > > That clause only deals with some anthology works, not all. It's an > > exception to <<a "work based on the Program" means either the Program or > > any derivative work under copyright law: that is to say, a work containing > > the Program or a portion of it, either verbatim or with modifications...>> > > It's pretty clear that the linux kernel is not a mere aggregation of > > works on some volume of storage. > > Any chance you guys could come to some kind of consensus on this so I > know what has to be done for the debian package?
The current release policy says that all firmware not licensed under GPL-compatible licenses needs to be removed. It also says that any sourceless firmware needs to be removed. http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2004/06/msg00064.html Depending on the outcome of GRs, it might change so that only the former class has to be removed. Either way, firmware not licensed under a GPL-compatible license needs to be removed. -- Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
