MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2004-06-07 01:43:08 +0100 Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I see a license with a clause that both I and Henning [1] found > > potentially > > questionable, so I brought it to the attention of the rest of the > > list. > > Searching the list archive by that message-id brings no results, you > know? > > You seem to have made a decision that this licence is ambiguous > *before* asking the list. I think you have been wasting the list's > time.
He is not the only person who thinks the license is ambiguous. Nor is he the only person who thinks that you're being a bit touchy. Take a chill pill. Cheers, Walter Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
